AMD duron vs AMD sempron.?
Answers:
mmm .. if u were converting an avi movie file to dvd and it took 2 hours to do the job on the sempron .. it would probably take 4 hours on the duron ... but for everyday tasks like surfing the web and using word u wouldnt notice alot of difference ..
It's all about Windows!
sempron sucks i have it
The both the Sempron and Duron are very low in performance. They were built for the basic features of computing. High-End Durons could compete with Low-End Semprons. High-End Semprons can not compete with the Highest-End Athlon XP (Dropped for the Athlon 64). The highest end Athlon XP is the 3200+ (2.2Ghz 700mhz FSB). But my brother has a Sempron 3500+, it seems to open Internet Explorer 7 and Firefox alot faster than my old Athlon XP 3200+. Here are the specs: (1) Sempron 3500+ (64Bit) 512mb DDR 160GB HDD GeForce 6200 (2) Athlon XP 3200+ 1GB DDR 200GB HDD Radeon 9800. As you can see the Athlon XP is superior in equipment. I benchmarked both pcs and the Athlon XP won, by alot. So if it comes to Duron vs. Sempron, it's Sempron. Sempron is still great for non-graphic intensive games, browing the web, watching DVDs, and Office Applications. Plus the Semprons are 64bit. I don't recommend Semprons for Vista (any of them). Windows XP is hard enough. Hope this helps!
The answers post by the user, for information only, RunQA.com does not guarantee the right.
More Questions and Answers ...